It is an established fact that climate changes, and it will continue to do so regardless of human influence. These are the only incontrovertible facts we have. Therefore, it is reasonable to assert that individual or collective human actions cannot prevent the inherent process of climate change.
The discussion surrounding the rate of climate change is fundamentally flawed. What constitutes an appropriate rate of change? Who has determined the optimal rate, and on what basis?
The narrative of a climate change emergency, sometimes referred to pejoratively as “voodoo science,” has been used to support the green industry. This sector has, in turn, generated employment opportunities. One of the government’s primary functions is to foster job creation and economic growth, and promoting the climate change agenda serves this purpose.
While I do not hold governments accountable for encouraging scientists to alter and distort scientific data to support the climate change agenda, I do hold scientists responsible, as I have a deep respect for the integrity of science.
P.S. Before labelling me a denier, understand this: I acknowledge that climate changes. It always has and always will.
P.S.S. And before you ask, of course, we must look after our planet.
First dropped: | Last modified: May 28, 2024
Dynamically AI Generated Supplement
The content below (by Google's Gemini-Pro) is regenerated monthly. It was last updated 01/02/2025.
Mothcloud's Climate Change and the Integrity of Science: 5 Recent Articles
#Article 1
Title: Climate change denial is a major threat to the world's poorest people
Link: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jan/19/climate-change-denial-is-a-major-threat-to-the-worlds-poorest-people-report
Source: The Guardian
Description: A report by the Overseas Development Institute warns that the poorest people are disproportionately affected by climate change, despite being the least responsible for it. The report also finds that climate change denial is a major obstacle to action.
Relevance: This article highlights the ethical implications of climate change denial and provides direct links to its consequences for vulnerable communities.
Date Published: January 19, 2023
#Article 2
Title: 10 years on from 'Climategate,' we're still dealing with scientific misinformation
Link: https://theconversation.com/10-years-on-from-climategate-we-re-still-dealing-with-scientific-misinformation-100970
Source: The Conversation
Description: This article revisits the 'Climategate' controversy, a hacking incident that led to the release of emails from climate scientists. These emails were misrepresented by some to suggest a conspiracy to cover up evidence of climate change. The article argues that the 'Climategate' incident demonstrates the importance of scientific transparency and the need to combat misinformation.
Relevance: This article directly connects the integrity of science with the potential for manipulation and misinformation that can hinder public understanding of important issues like climate change.
Date Published: November 16, 2020
#Article 3
Title: Climate change impacts: Is 'loss and damage' the new front line in climate talks?
Link: https://www.dw.com/en/climate-change-impacts-is-loss-and-damage-the-new-front-line-in-climate-talks/a-51014827
Source: Deutsche Welle
Description: This article explores the concept of 'loss and damage' in the context of climate change. Loss and damage refers to the negative impacts of climate change that cannot be prevented through adaptation measures. The article discusses the increasing focus on loss and damage in international climate talks, and the challenges associated with addressing this issue.
Relevance: This article delves into the repercussions of climate change and the need for support and accountability related to its devastating effects, particularly relevant to Mothcloud's call for recognizing and addressing scientific limitations in the face of a changing climate.
Date Published: November 15, 2020
#Article 4
Title: The scientific consensus on climate change: How do we know what we know?
Link: https://skepticalscience.com/consensus.php
Source: Skeptical Science
Description: This website provides detailed information on the scientific consensus on climate change. It includes evidence from multiple studies, as well as responses to common climate change denial arguments.
Relevance: This resource offers a comprehensive and scientifically supported understanding of climate change, addressing concerns and skepticism with factual evidence. Aligning with Mothcloud's objective to combat misinformation through open and critical engagement.
Date Published: Updated 21 November 2023
#Article 5
Title: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
Link: https://www.ipcc.ch/
Source: United Nations
Description: The IPCC is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change. It publishes regular reports on the latest climate science, impacts and risks, and response options.
Relevance: This resource serves as a central authority on climate change science, providing access to extensive research, data, and policy recommendations related to climate change concerns.
Date Published: Ongoing updates and reports published periodically
An interesting article “Why probability probably doesn’t exist (but it is useful to act like it does)” by David Spiegelhalter
Me: Climate change science heavily relies on probability and statistical analysis to predict trends, understand uncertainties, and project future scenarios.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-04096-5